Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Three things to remember ahead of Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr’s remarks

With Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr set to speak at the 2024 U.S. Treasury Market Conference today, attention is turning to potential insights into the anticipated Basel III Endgame re-proposal. While Barr has previously outlined revisions, questions remain for what this means for Americans across the economy. As we look ahead, here are three key points to remember:
 
The anticipated revisions to the U.S. rules for Basel III Endgame will require American banks to maintain substantially more capital than those in the U.K. and the EU, placing the U.S. at a significant competitive disadvantage.

  • Consulting firm PwC finds that Basel III Endgame would raise costs for American banks in ways that would not apply to foreign competitors. "Differences between the U.S. proposal and adoption of the Basel Framework in other jurisdictions could result in different capital treatment for similar risks across global banks. The NPR’s requirements would raise costs for U.S. banks in ways that would not apply to foreign competitors for the same transactions. This outcome would undermine the goal of having globally consistent capital requirements and create a misalignment of risk, whereby capital requirements for the same risks would differ by jurisdiction." (Adam Gilbert et al., "Basel III Endgame: Assessing the bigger picture," PwC, 2024)

The original Basel III Endgame proposal lacked a robust economic analysis.

  • The Chamber of Commerce noted that the original proposal lacked comprehensive economic analysis, and thus underestimated its negative economic consequences. "Not only has a comprehensive economic analysis not taken place, but the basis of the Proposal is flawed. The Proposal is primarily based on an outdated QIS conducted by BCBS from 2017 that comprised a total of 248 banks, only 12 of which were US-based. 9 U.S. banks represent less than 5 percent of the banks that participated in the exercise. Undue reliance on data that fails to adequately represent U.S. banks could explain why the Proposal stands to create so many harmful downstream consequences for the American economy." (U.S. Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President Tom Quaadman, Letter, 1/16/2024)

Opposition to the Basel III Endgame proposal extends beyond the banking sector. It's widespread, diverse, and bipartisan.

  • Approximately 86% of negative comments posted during the public comment period for the initial version of Basel III Endgame came from outside the banking sector. (Latham & Watkins, "The Basel III Endgame Proposal: Public Comments Snapshots," 2/2/2024)
  • 225 Democratic and Republican Members of Congress (including one Independent Senator who caucuses with the Democrats) wrote or signed letters expressing opposition to or serious concern with the initial version of the Basel III Endgame proposal. (Latham & Watkins, "The Basel III Endgame Proposal: Public Comments Snapshots," 2/2/2024)

The Basel III Endgame proposal revisions must address these shortcomings to protect American economic security and maintain U.S. competitiveness.