Problems With The Plan - ANOTHER BILL AMERICANS CAN’T AFFORD

Consumer & small business impact

U.S. economic impact

U.S. competitiveness

Banking's proven resilience

THE REAL COST OF
BASEL III ENDGAME:

UNDERSTANDINGWASHINGTON'S CAPITALREGULATION PLAN

Everyday Americans must not bear the brunt of Washington's proposal. The initial proposal for Basel III Endgame would have resulted in elevated borrowing costs and decreased access to credit for consumers.

THE NEW CAPITAL REGULATION PLAN WILL HARM:

Lower- and

Middle-Income

Families:

Increased borrowing costs will put large purchases, such as a car or appliances, further out of reach for lower- and middle-income Americans that rely on credit to secure high-value, necessary expenditures.

SMALL

BUSINESSES:

Small and new businesses rely on loans to run their operations, make payroll, and contribute to their local economy. Without reliable access to credit, they become more vulnerable, affecting the hiring of new employees and expansion plans.

FARMERS:

Farmers who often use hedging in their operations will also face higher costs and fewer options. Decreasing farmers’ access to credit will make it harder for them to finance their operations, purchase equipment, or invest in their farms. This can cause a ripple effect on an already vulnerable industry—impacting local economies, agricultural suppliers, and food processors.

Federal regulators' proposal

will drive these individuals towards costlier and riskier methods of capital acquisition, such as the shadow banks.

It will hurt the economy at a time of high inflation.

Higher capital requirements prevent banks from having more funding available to lend to consumers, making it harder for consumers to buy houses, cars, or make appliance repairs—all of which will slow the economy at a time when inflation continues to remain high.

$100
billion

A substantial increase in capital requirements could raise annual borrowing costs. This would cost the economy over $100 billion annually and result in more lending by shadow banks.

$1
TRILLION

The Peterson Institute found that raising capital requirements by two percentage points would decrease the U.S. GDP by $1 trillion over 30 years.

It will put foreignbusinesses aheadof U.S. businesses.

No other country or jurisdiction plans to adopt the approach proposed in Washington's capital regulation plan.

Large U.S. banks are already subject to stricter capital requirements and maintain more equity capital on their balance sheet than their European competitors, putting American businesses at a disadvantage.

This proposal will mean that some foreign businesses will be able to borrow at a lower cost, giving them an unfair competitive advantage over U.S.-based companies that borrow from U.S. banks.

U.S. banks haveproven resilient throughunprecedented economic disruptions.

The nation's largest banks have acted as a source of strength during the COVID-19 pandemic and the banking turmoil of 2023, facilitating credit to small and large businesses and providing billions in deposits to First Republic Bank to help stem contagion within the banking industry.

"Our banking system is sound and resilient."

— Michael Barr,
Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve said in its May 2023 Financial Stability Report that the largest U.S. banks are 'well capitalized,' and when releasing the results of its annual stress test in June, the Fed said, "large banks are well positioned to weather a severe recession and continue to lend to households and businesses even during a severe recession.

Bank capital has tripled over the last 15 years, and even Michael Barr, Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve, agrees: "Our banking system is sound and resilient."

WHY IT MAKESZERO SENSE.VIEW ALL

Email blasts

09.9.24

Three things to consider ahead of Barr's speech tomorrow